A number of people have asked me for more details about the situation in Tibet. I’ve realized that I have a tendency to excoriate the hypocrisy in the press without necessarily offering much additional in the way of compensatory education. So I’d like to remedy things by explaining the facts in more detail.
First, read this excellent paper from UCLA: "How Repressive is the Chinese Government in Tibet?". I find the analysis to still be relatively biased toward a western viewpoint, but far more factual than the typical newspaper report. You should definitely read it, but I’ll highlight some of the key facts:
- Population of ethnic Tibetans has grown dramatically during the period of time when they were supposedly being swamped by Han Chinese.
- Chinese government allows Tibetans to have 4+ children, while Han Chinese are permitted only 1 child.
- Han population live almost entirely in the cities, working reconstruction contracts, and tend to get the hell out of town as soon as they can.
- While Han Chinese culture may be influencing Tibetan youngsters to abandon their traditions (which are not that old or traditional, BTW); western culture is influencing them more.
The paper concludes that Tibetans may be suffering from "social and economic marginalization", but there is no concerted effort to commit cultural or ethnic genocide, and in fact the Chinese government is engaged in what amounts to an affirmative action program to attempt to offset some of this marginalization.
I largely agree with this conclusion. When you have a nation with 1 billion Han Chinese and 6 million Tibetans, it’s going to be very difficult for Tibetans to gain an economic or cultural edge. Han Chinese culture is chauvinistic. Nothing malicious about it; that’s just the way it is.
Furthermore, the efforts of the Chinese government to lift Tibetans seem to me to be more honest and consistent than the efforts of U.S. in affirmative action. A far larger percentage of black and latino men in America are in prison today than are Tibetan men in prison in China. The rabble-rousers would like you to believe that Tibetans in China are treated like Rodney King, but the media were only able to capture footage of Tibetans massacring innocent Chinese women and children.
The "religious freedom" arguments are also hollow. One thing people don’t realize is that there is no right of free assembly in China, and religions are strictly regulated by the government. Trust me; these restrictions are strongly supported by the Han Chinese, and they would vote the restrictions back in if they were relaxed. That’s just the way it is.
Take the Christian Church in China, for example. The government stuffed the church with Cardinals selected by the communist party. The pope excommunicated the Cardinals. The Cardinals happily continue to serve as heads of the church. This is how religions work in China. But this is normal. The Tibetan monks have more autonomy than any other religious group in China.
It’s interesting, isn’t it? George Bush ignores the situation of black and latino people in America, while claiming that the less-severe marginalization of Tibetans is a "human rights" issue. He doesn’t say a word about the Christian church in China being controlled by the government, but demands that the religious dictator head of a buddhist death cult be given sovereignty over the central government. And he argues that the Tibetans are being too heavily influenced by Chinese culture, while the Tibetan exile government has become essentially a puppet and mouthpiece of the western "cult of liberty" and a pawn for the neocons C.I.A.