<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Better Living Through Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://netcrucible.com/blog/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://netcrucible.com/blog</link>
	<description>Software, poetry, and philosophy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:21:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A Function for Consciousness by Sean</title>
		<link>http://netcrucible.com/blog/2012/07/28/a-function-for-consciousness/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2012 03:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcrucible.com/blog/?p=1030#comment-356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This was a thought provoking read, I too am suprised that most science minded folk and programmers want to insist it is a feedback loop neural network which at some certain degree of complexity, has this self-awareness and sentience emerge. Emergence doesn&#039;t cut it for me, I think penrose mentioned structures that could potentially resemble quantum nano-tubules but I never saw anything scientific published on that hypothesis so I doubt it. One thing is for sure, the mind/body problem is far from solved.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a thought provoking read, I too am suprised that most science minded folk and programmers want to insist it is a feedback loop neural network which at some certain degree of complexity, has this self-awareness and sentience emerge. Emergence doesn&#8217;t cut it for me, I think penrose mentioned structures that could potentially resemble quantum nano-tubules but I never saw anything scientific published on that hypothesis so I doubt it. One thing is for sure, the mind/body problem is far from solved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Puzzling About Solipsism by Joshua</title>
		<link>http://netcrucible.com/blog/2012/06/19/puzzling-about-solipsism/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2012 08:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://netcrucible.com/blog/?p=1005#comment-354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#039;ve seen your paper and code, and I think the 15+ hypotheses theory holds for a great many scenarios.  A broad sample space is essential for most decision making.

I&#039;m more interested in the cases (whether minority or not) where there are clear contradictions and dualisms, and motivation to keep both in mind, with conviction.  I believe that, out of the 15-10,000 hypotheses we consider, we tend to settle on only two, and we allow ourselves to &quot;wobble&quot; between those two.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;ve seen your paper and code, and I think the 15+ hypotheses theory holds for a great many scenarios.  A broad sample space is essential for most decision making.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more interested in the cases (whether minority or not) where there are clear contradictions and dualisms, and motivation to keep both in mind, with conviction.  I believe that, out of the 15-10,000 hypotheses we consider, we tend to settle on only two, and we allow ourselves to &#8220;wobble&#8221; between those two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
